OpenAI’s Nonprofit Windfall: A Bold Case for Ending Extreme Poverty OpenAI began with noble intentions as a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. But ambitious goals demand resources far beyond what donations and grants can provide. Scaling cutting-edge AI research required massive capital. So the nonprofit gave birth to a for-profit arm. Today, that structure has matured: the OpenAI Foundation, the nonprofit parent, controls the for-profit OpenAI Group (a public benefit corporation) and holds a substantial 26% equity stake—valued at approximately $130 billion based on recent valuations. This ownership position has transformed the OpenAI Foundation into one of the world’s largest nonprofits by asset size, dwarfing many traditional philanthropic giants. With such resources at its disposal, the question becomes: What is the most effective way to deploy this capital for maximum human impact?The Case for Direct InterventionThe strongest answer may be the most straightforward: intervene directly to eradicate extreme poverty, with zero leakage to intermediaries, bureaucracy, or overhead. Rather than spreading funds across fragmented causes or research initiatives, the Foundation could target verifiable, immediate human suffering—lifting the world’s poorest out of destitution in a measurable, accountable way. India offers a compelling starting point. Despite remarkable economic progress and a dramatic reduction in poverty over the past decade—thanks to growth, welfare programs, and digital infrastructure—the country still contains a sizable population segment living at levels comparable to sub-Saharan Africa’s extreme poverty. Recent estimates place India’s extreme poverty rate (around the $2.15–$3 per day line) in the low single digits nationally, but pockets of deep deprivation persist, especially in rural areas and among vulnerable groups. Millions still face hunger, malnutrition, and limited opportunity. Leveraging India’s Digital Public InfrastructureWhat makes India uniquely positioned for high-impact philanthropy is its world-class digital public goods. The Aadhaar biometric identification system, combined with UPI (Unified Payments Interface) and Jan Dhan bank accounts—the JAM trinity—has revolutionized last-mile delivery of benefits. Direct Benefit Transfers (DBTs) have already moved trillions of rupees with dramatically reduced leakage compared to traditional subsidy systems. This infrastructure enables precise, transparent, and instantaneous cash transfers to identified beneficiaries. Targeting could focus on the poorest households using existing multidimensional poverty indices, consumption data, or Aadhaar-linked welfare rolls. Funds could flow straight into bank accounts linked to mobile phones, bypassing corrupt middlemen and inefficient NGOs. Recipients decide how best to use the money—for food, education, healthcare, or small investments—empowering them rather than dictating solutions from afar. Pilot programs and scaled government schemes have demonstrated that such unconditional or lightly conditioned cash transfers reduce poverty effectively, improve nutrition, boost school attendance, and even enhance women’s agency. With OpenAI’s resources, the Foundation could supercharge this approach: not just incremental aid, but a decisive push toward eliminating extreme poverty in targeted regions or demographic groups.Zero Leakage, Measurable ImpactTraditional philanthropy often suffers from high administrative costs, mission drift, and uncertain outcomes. By contrast, direct cash transfers via Aadhaar-UPI offer near-zero leakage. Blockchain or public dashboards could provide real-time transparency on disbursements and allow rigorous evaluation through randomized studies or satellite/survey data. The scale is feasible. A $130 billion endowment, even conservatively managed, could generate substantial annual payouts while preserving principal. Directed strategically, this could transform the lives of tens of millions, creating ripple effects through increased local consumption, human capital development, and economic mobility.A Catalyst for Silicon Valley PhilanthropyBeyond the direct good, such an initiative would set a powerful precedent. OpenAI’s success story—from nonprofit origins to world-changing valuation—already inspires awe. If its Foundation demonstrates that frontier technology wealth can be channeled into decisive, evidence-based poverty eradication, it could open the floodgates for other Silicon Valley leaders and AI-driven fortunes. Tech philanthropists, often criticized for pet projects or ineffective giving, would see a replicable model: identify a solvable problem, leverage proven infrastructure, deliver with radical efficiency, and measure relentlessly. Critics might argue that AI companies should focus solely on safety, alignment, or technological breakthroughs. But abundance created by AI should ultimately serve humanity’s most pressing needs. Eradicating extreme poverty is not charity—it is a high-leverage investment in global stability, future markets, and shared prosperity that aligns perfectly with OpenAI’s founding mission. The OpenAI Foundation stands at a historic juncture. With its unique resources and the world’s most sophisticated technology ecosystem behind it, it has the chance to do what few large philanthropies have achieved: deliver transformative, verifiable impact at scale. Starting with India’s remaining extreme poor via direct digital transfers would not only be effective policy—it would be a statement that the AI revolution’s gains can, and should, reach the world’s poorest first.
Elon. You have no case. You started by ringing alarm bells on AI (and some of those concerns are valid today) because you feared where @Google was headed with AI. But as things stand today, you are in the AI arms race. You are not thinking safety.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) April 9, 2026
A non-profit became a for-profit. Big deal. Only two years ago, you made a sincere effort to by @OpenAI Were you trying to buy a non-profit or a for-profit? That status did not bother you then.
Work hard. Compete with each other. Serve your customers.
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) April 9, 2026
Javed. God is real. So is The Devil. Islam is The Devil's religion. The Devil is an active spiritual force. 🕊️ Barackface: The Power of the Iranian Diaspora https://t.co/CeQNFwJ0cU
Thanks for the like. Let me marketing for your startup. Treating Marketing As Propulsion, Not Decoration https://t.co/C237giJTBL Marketing Escape Velocity: The Path To Unicorn Status And Beyond https://t.co/hUmu5bv6z0
My thesis is that the entire realm of economic opportunities in software will come down to Idea Guys vs Execution Guys.
If you already have distribution or monopoly power, you want Idea Guys. This is a privileged position – You can afford to move slowly, pressure-test ideas,…
Economic disruption spreads as entry-level jobs vanish, wealth concentrates, and social unrest erupts worldwide. Governments scramble, yet nationalistic competition fuels an AI arms race. 🧵👆👇@drfeifei@KirkDBorne@Ronald_vanLoon@BernardMarr@alliekmiller
Amid escalating chaos, Amodei convenes an unprecedented international coalition in Kyoto, uniting CEOs, heads of state, and AI researchers from China, India, Israel, Europe, and the U.S. 🧵👇👆@bradlightcap@kevinweil@markchen90@billpeeb
Ethical reasoning is embedded at their core, and human values are enforced not just in code but in international norms. 🧵👇👆@DanielaAmodei@drew_bent@AnthropicAI
Vigilance remains central, yet the relationship between humans and AI has transformed—from one of fear and potential domination to collaboration, stewardship, and trust. 🧵👆👇@IVP@ValiantCP@MenloVentures @ProbeCap @ThriveCapital@insightpartners
Leaks say OpenAI is building IO: a screenless, pen-shaped, wearable AI agent you can carry or wear on a strap. Mic + camera for context, and it can turn handwritten notes into text and sync straight into ChatGPT.
OpenAI’s io: The Promise—and Peril—of an Ambient AI Agent
What happens when artificial intelligence slips out of the screen and into your pocket, your conversations, your life?
According to a growing trail of leaks, reports, and industry whispers, OpenAI’s mysterious hardware project—often referred to simply as “io”—is attempting exactly that. If the vision holds, io could mark a pivotal moment in computing: not another screen to stare into, but an ambient AI presence that listens, observes, remembers, and assists quietly in the background.
Yet history is littered with ambitious AI hardware experiments that promised the future and delivered discomfort, distrust, or irrelevance. The question is not whether io is bold—it undeniably is—but whether it can succeed where others have stumbled.
The Big Idea: AI Without a Screen
At its core, io is OpenAI’s bet on ambient computing—a long-theorized paradigm in which technology fades into the environment instead of demanding constant attention. Think of AI not as an app you open, but as a companion that’s simply there.
Developed in collaboration with legendary designer Jony Ive, following OpenAI’s reported $6.5 billion acquisition of his startup “io” in mid-2025, the device is described as:
Screenless
Pen-shaped
Pocket-sized
Always available, but not always intrusive
It can reportedly be slipped into a pocket, placed on a desk, or worn on a neck strap—positioned somewhere between a gadget and a wearable, but intentionally avoiding the social awkwardness of smart glasses or lapel pins.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has publicly hyped the concept as a “third core device”, alongside smartphones and laptops. Internally, ambitions are even grander: shipping 100 million units faster than any consumer product in history, potentially adding $1 trillion in value to OpenAI.
That is not incremental thinking. That is moonshot logic.
Design Philosophy: Jony Ive’s Quiet Minimalism
Physically, io is said to be roughly the size of an old iPod Shuffle—a deliberate nod to unobtrusive elegance. No screen. No flashy indicators. No attempt to compete visually with the smartphone.
This is classic Ive: design that recedes rather than shouts.
By avoiding fixed body placement, io attempts to solve one of the biggest failures of recent AI hardware. The Humane AI Pin, for instance, was criticized for being socially uncomfortable, ergonomically awkward, and visually distracting. io aims to be flexible—there when needed, invisible when not.
If Apple’s design ethos was “technology as jewelry,” io is closer to technology as air.
Key Features and Capabilities (As Reported)
1. Ambient Sensing
Built-in microphones and cameras give io contextual awareness—allowing it to hear conversations, recognize objects or environments, and respond proactively rather than reactively.
In theory, this enables:
Automatic transcription
Context-aware reminders
Scene or object recognition
Conversational summaries
In practice, it raises immediate privacy questions (more on that later).
2. Handwritten Notes → AI Memory
One standout feature is real-time conversion of handwritten notes into editable digital text. A scribble on paper, a whiteboard sketch, or a meeting note can be captured and sent directly to ChatGPT for:
Summarization
Organization
Follow-up actions
Long-term memory
For journalists, executives, students, and creators, this could be transformative—turning analog thought into structured intelligence effortlessly.
3. Voice-First AI Interaction
Unlike phones, which force users into visual interfaces, io is designed to be voice-native. Advances in OpenAI’s low-latency audio models make natural, conversational interaction plausible—less “Hey Siri,” more human dialogue.
Heavy computation is offloaded to smartphones or cloud infrastructure, keeping the device light and power-efficient.
4. Battery Life and Portability
Early prototypes reportedly target multi-day to week-long battery life, leaning heavily on cloud processing to reduce onboard compute needs.
If achieved, this would be a major differentiator in a category plagued by short battery spans.
Why io Could Actually Matter
1. Escaping the Tyranny of Screens
We live in a world of glowing rectangles—phones, laptops, tablets, watches. io challenges that norm by suggesting AI doesn’t need a screen to be useful.
For professionals, creatives, and students fatigued by constant digital distraction, an ambient assistant could feel liberating—AI that works with you, not at you.
2. Practical, Not Performative, Use Cases
Many AI devices failed because they answered a question nobody asked. io at least targets real pain points:
Capturing fleeting ideas
Remembering conversations
Organizing unstructured thoughts
Reducing friction between offline life and digital systems
If it does nothing else but make memory frictionless, it could earn its place.
3. Backend Power Matters
Unlike the Rabbit R1 or similar devices that struggled with shallow functionality, io plugs directly into OpenAI’s vast AI infrastructure. That backend advantage cannot be overstated.
AI hardware without serious AI behind it is just plastic.
4. Price and Scale
Rumors suggest a sub-$200 price point. If true, and if OpenAI subsidizes hardware to grow ecosystem lock-in, mass adoption becomes plausible—especially given Altman’s stated goal of shipping at unprecedented scale.
The Dark Clouds: Why Skepticism Is Justified
1. Privacy: The Original Sin
An always-on microphone and camera is not a neutral design choice—it is a social and ethical grenade.
Without:
Clear physical indicators (lights, shutters)
Granular user controls
Strong on-device processing
End-to-end encryption
…io risks being perceived as a surveillance device, not a companion.
Previous AI hardware scandals—including data exposure incidents with other devices—have primed users to distrust “trust us” promises. Even Altman’s claim that OpenAI treats user data as “maximally sensitive” may not be enough.
Trust, once lost, does not reboot easily.
2. Technical Reality vs. Vision
Real-time multimodal AI is computationally expensive and error-prone. Challenges include:
Hallucinations
Latency
Speaker differentiation
Noisy environments
Poor connectivity scenarios
An ambient assistant that gets things almost right may be more frustrating than one that does nothing at all.
3. The Graveyard of AI Gadgets
The road to io is paved with tombstones:
Humane AI Pin
Friend pendant
Rabbit R1
Each promised a new paradigm. Each underestimated human psychology, privacy anxiety, or the simple question: Why not just use my phone?
Screenless design is elegant—but it also removes feedback, reassurance, and control. Many users want to see what their device is doing.
4. Cultural Resistance
Not everyone wants an AI shadow. Online reactions already show concerns about:
Surveillance
Accessibility
Redundancy
Emotional discomfort
The idea of an AI that listens constantly may be philosophically exciting—and viscerally unsettling.
Manufacturing, Timing, and Geopolitics
The expected launch window—late 2026 or early 2027—puts io under immense execution pressure. Manufacturing is reportedly planned outside China, with partners like Foxconn, to mitigate geopolitical risks.
Delays, supply chain hiccups, or unfinished software could easily push timelines back—dangerous in a hype-driven market.
Final Verdict: Revolution or High-Risk Experiment?
io is not foolish. It is not trivial. And it is certainly not boring.
It represents OpenAI’s attempt to answer a profound question: What does AI look like when it stops asking for attention?
If OpenAI nails:
Privacy safeguards
Battery life
Trustworthy behavior
One or two genuinely indispensable use cases
…io could mark a genuine shift toward ambient intelligence.
But the odds are unforgiving.
This is a market with little patience, deep skepticism, and a long memory of failures. The line between “invisible assistant” and “creepy observer” is razor-thin.
For now, io feels less like the next iPhone—and more like a bold, necessary experiment that may shape the future even if it doesn’t dominate it.
Rating: 6/10 High vision. High risk. Real potential. Serious hurdles.
If you’re privacy-conscious or skeptical of always-on AI, your doubts are rational. For everyone else, io is worth watching—not because it’s guaranteed to succeed, but because it dares to ask what comes after the screen.
OpenAI का io: एम्बिएंट AI एजेंट का वादा — और उसका जोखिम
जब कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता स्क्रीन से बाहर निकलकर आपकी जेब, आपकी बातचीत और आपके जीवन में प्रवेश करती है—तो क्या होता है?
हालिया लीक, रिपोर्टों और उद्योग जगत की फुसफुसाहटों के अनुसार, OpenAI की रहस्यमयी हार्डवेयर परियोजना—जिसे प्रायः सिर्फ “io” कहा जा रहा है—ठीक यही करने का प्रयास कर रही है। यदि यह दृष्टि साकार होती है, तो io कंप्यूटिंग के इतिहास में एक निर्णायक मोड़ बन सकता है: कोई और स्क्रीन नहीं, बल्कि एक ऐसा एम्बिएंट AI जो चुपचाप सुनता है, देखता है, याद रखता है और पृष्ठभूमि में सहायता करता है।
लेकिन इतिहास उन AI हार्डवेयर प्रयोगों से भरा पड़ा है जिन्होंने भविष्य का वादा किया—और बदले में असहजता, अविश्वास या निरर्थकता दी। सवाल यह नहीं है कि io साहसी है या नहीं—वह निस्संदेह है—बल्कि यह है कि क्या वह वहाँ सफल हो सकता है जहाँ अन्य असफल हुए।
बड़ा विचार: बिना स्क्रीन के AI
अपने मूल में, io OpenAI की एम्बिएंट कंप्यूटिंग पर लगाई गई बाज़ी है—एक ऐसा विचार जिसमें तकनीक ध्यान खींचने के बजाय वातावरण में घुल जाती है। AI कोई ऐप नहीं जिसे आप खोलें, बल्कि एक ऐसा साथी जो बस मौजूद रहता है।
किंवदंती डिजाइनर जॉनी आइव के साथ मिलकर विकसित यह डिवाइस—जिसकी पृष्ठभूमि में 2025 के मध्य में OpenAI द्वारा उनकी स्टार्टअप “io” का कथित 6.5 अरब डॉलर का अधिग्रहण बताया जाता है—इन विशेषताओं के साथ वर्णित किया गया है:
स्क्रीन-रहित
पेन के आकार का
जेब में रखने योग्य
हमेशा उपलब्ध, लेकिन हमेशा दखल देने वाला नहीं
इसे जेब में रखा जा सकता है, डेस्क पर रखा जा सकता है, या गले में लटकाया जा सकता है—यह न पूरी तरह गैजेट है, न ही पारंपरिक पहनने योग्य डिवाइस।
OpenAI के CEO सैम ऑल्टमैन इसे स्मार्टफोन और लैपटॉप के साथ एक “तीसरा मुख्य डिवाइस” बता चुके हैं। आंतरिक स्तर पर महत्वाकांक्षा और भी बड़ी है: इतिहास में किसी भी उत्पाद से तेज़ी से 100 मिलियन यूनिट भेजने का लक्ष्य, जिससे कंपनी के मूल्य में 1 ट्रिलियन डॉलर तक का इज़ाफ़ा हो सकता है।
यह क्रमिक सोच नहीं है—यह चंद्रमा पर निशाना लगाने जैसा साहस है।
डिजाइन दर्शन: जॉनी आइव की मौन न्यूनतावाद
भौतिक रूप से, io का आकार पुराने iPod Shuffle जैसा बताया जाता है—जानबूझकर चुनी गई सादगी। कोई स्क्रीन नहीं। कोई चमकदार डिस्प्ले नहीं। स्मार्टफोन से दृश्य प्रतिस्पर्धा करने का कोई प्रयास नहीं।
यह शुद्ध आइव दर्शन है: ऐसी डिजाइन जो चिल्लाती नहीं, बल्कि पीछे हट जाती है।
स्थायी रूप से शरीर से जुड़े उपकरणों से बचकर, io हालिया AI हार्डवेयर की सबसे बड़ी असफलता को संबोधित करता है। Humane AI Pin को सामाजिक रूप से असहज और उपयोग में अटपटा कहा गया। io लचीलापन चाहता है—ज़रूरत पड़ने पर मौजूद, अन्यथा अदृश्य।
अगर Apple की डिजाइन “तकनीक को आभूषण” बनाती थी, तो ioतकनीक को हवा बनाना चाहता है।
प्रमुख फीचर्स और क्षमताएँ (रिपोर्ट्स के अनुसार)
1. एम्बिएंट सेंसिंग
इनबिल्ट माइक्रोफोन और कैमरे io को संदर्भ समझने की क्षमता देते हैं—बातचीत सुनना, वस्तुओं या वातावरण को पहचानना, और बिना पूछे सुझाव देना।
सिद्धांत रूप में यह सक्षम करता है:
स्वचालित ट्रांसक्रिप्शन
संदर्भ-आधारित रिमाइंडर
दृश्य पहचान
बातचीत का सारांश
व्यवहार में, यह तुरंत गोपनीयता के प्रश्न खड़े करता है।
2. हस्तलिखित नोट्स → AI मेमोरी
एक प्रमुख फीचर है हस्तलिखित नोट्स को रीयल-टाइम में डिजिटल टेक्स्ट में बदलना। कागज़ पर लिखा विचार, व्हाइटबोर्ड स्केच या मीटिंग नोट सीधे ChatGPT को भेजे जा सकते हैं:
सारांश
संगठन
फ़ॉलो-अप कार्य
दीर्घकालिक स्मृति
पत्रकारों, अधिकारियों, छात्रों और रचनाकारों के लिए यह एनालॉग सोच को संरचित बुद्धिमत्ता में बदल सकता है।
3. वॉइस-फर्स्ट AI इंटरैक्शन
फोन जहाँ दृश्य इंटरफ़ेस थोपते हैं, वहीं io को आवाज़-आधारित बनाया गया है। OpenAI के लो-लेटेंसी ऑडियो मॉडल प्राकृतिक बातचीत को संभव बनाते हैं—कम “Hey Siri”, ज़्यादा मानवीय संवाद।
भारी गणना स्मार्टफोन या क्लाउड पर भेजी जाती है, जिससे डिवाइस हल्का और ऊर्जा-कुशल रहता है।
4. बैटरी और पोर्टेबिलिटी
प्रारंभिक प्रोटोटाइप्स में कई दिनों से लेकर एक सप्ताह तक की बैटरी लाइफ का लक्ष्य बताया गया है, जो क्लाउड प्रोसेसिंग पर निर्भर करता है।
यदि यह हासिल हुआ, तो यह श्रेणी में बड़ा अंतर पैदा करेगा।
io क्यों महत्वपूर्ण हो सकता है
1. स्क्रीन के अत्याचार से मुक्ति
हम चमकती स्क्रीन के युग में जी रहे हैं। io यह प्रश्न उठाता है कि क्या AI उपयोगी होने के लिए स्क्रीन पर निर्भर होना ज़रूरी है?
डिजिटल थकान से जूझ रहे पेशेवरों और छात्रों के लिए, यह मुक्ति जैसा महसूस हो सकता है।
2. दिखावे से ज़्यादा उपयोगिता
कई AI डिवाइस इसलिए असफल हुए क्योंकि वे किसी वास्तविक समस्या को हल नहीं करते थे। io कम से कम इन दर्द बिंदुओं को छूता है:
क्षणिक विचारों को पकड़ना
बातचीत को याद रखना
असंरचित जानकारी को व्यवस्थित करना
अगर यह सिर्फ याददाश्त को सहज बना दे, तो भी इसका स्थान बन सकता है।
3. बैकएंड शक्ति का महत्व
Rabbit R1 जैसे उपकरणों के विपरीत, io सीधे OpenAI के शक्तिशाली AI इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर से जुड़ा है। यह बढ़त निर्णायक है।
मज़बूत AI के बिना हार्डवेयर सिर्फ प्लास्टिक होता है।
4. कीमत और पैमाना
अगर $200 से कम कीमत की अफवाह सही निकली, और OpenAI हार्डवेयर को सब्सिडाइज़ करे, तो बड़े पैमाने पर अपनाने की संभावना बनती है।
जोखिम और चुनौतियाँ
1. गोपनीयता: मूल पाप
हमेशा चालू माइक्रोफोन और कैमरा—यह सिर्फ तकनीकी नहीं, बल्कि सामाजिक और नैतिक मुद्दा है।
स्पष्ट संकेतकों, मजबूत एन्क्रिप्शन और यूज़र नियंत्रण के बिना, io एक सहायक से अधिक निगरानी उपकरण लग सकता है।
2. तकनीकी यथार्थ
रीयल-टाइम मल्टीमोडल AI भारी गणना मांगता है:
हैलुसिनेशन
विलंब
शोरगुल वाले माहौल
कमजोर कनेक्टिविटी
लगभग सही AI, पूरी तरह गलत AI से ज़्यादा परेशान कर सकता है।
3. असफलताओं का कब्रिस्तान
Humane AI Pin, Friend pendant, Rabbit R1—सभी ने नया युग दिखाया, लेकिन मानव मनोविज्ञान और विश्वास को कम आँका।
4. सांस्कृतिक प्रतिरोध
हर कोई AI साया नहीं चाहता। ऑनलाइन प्रतिक्रियाओं में पहले ही चिंता दिख रही है—निगरानी, पहुंच, अनावश्यकता।
निर्माण, समय और भू-राजनीति
संभावित लॉन्च 2026 के अंत या 2027 की शुरुआत में बताया जाता है। उत्पादन चीन के बाहर, Foxconn जैसे साझेदारों के साथ, भू-राजनीतिक जोखिम घटाने के लिए किया जा सकता है।
अंतिम निष्कर्ष: क्रांति या उच्च-जोखिम प्रयोग?
io मूर्खतापूर्ण नहीं है। यह छोटा विचार नहीं है। और यह निस्संदेह उबाऊ नहीं है।
यह एक मूल प्रश्न पूछता है: जब AI ध्यान माँगना बंद कर दे, तब वह कैसा दिखता है?
यदि OpenAI गोपनीयता, बैटरी, भरोसेमंद व्यवहार और एक-दो अनिवार्य उपयोग-मामलों को सही कर लेता है, तो io एम्बिएंट इंटेलिजेंस की दिशा बदल सकता है।
लेकिन रास्ता कठिन है।
यह ऐसा बाज़ार है जहाँ धैर्य कम है, संदेह गहरा है, और असफलताओं की स्मृति लंबी।
फिलहाल, io अगला iPhone कम और एक साहसी, आवश्यक प्रयोग अधिक लगता है—जो भले ही हावी न हो, पर भविष्य की दिशा ज़रूर तय कर सकता है।
रेटिंग: 6/10 उच्च दृष्टि। उच्च जोखिम। वास्तविक संभावना। गंभीर बाधाएँ।
अगर आप गोपनीयता को लेकर सतर्क हैं, तो आपका संदेह उचित है। बाकी सभी के लिए—io देखने लायक है, इसलिए नहीं कि यह निश्चित रूप से सफल होगा, बल्कि इसलिए कि यह स्क्रीन के बाद की दुनिया की कल्पना करने का साहस करता है।