Wednesday, May 20, 2026

The Flaw In Jeff's (And Elon's) Logic

This is simple geometry.

  1. Due to AI and robotics the table is about to flip. Scarcity economics is about to become abundance economics. Elon Musk reached that same conclusion independent of me. So I don't need to convince him. Jeff, on the other hand.
  2. With abundance the economy becomes moneyless. There is so much production of goods and services, money/currency has no more value.
  3. At that point, Jeff's 200B is zero. Elon's 800B is zero. That is two decades away at most. Could be 15 years. But let's say 20.
  4. The only question is, what do you want the transition to be like between now and then?
  5. Let's say I am Libertarian. Jeff alone should decide how much he consumes. Elon alone decides how much he consumes. And, by the way, AI and robotics are hugely deflationary. Before money disappears, things cost less and less and less, until they cost nothing. It will not be a dramatic, sudden disappearnace of money. It will be gradual. So what's the amount? How much do you need? For you and your children? Not grandchildren. Because there is no more money by then. 10B? Okay, you got it. Keep your 10B. Spend as much as you want. Looks like you already have a house, and a car, and a plane. So we are looking at food? Fuel?
  6. It is not like that 200B or 800B is being ploughed into their companies. The money just sits there. There is a nice ring to it. Jeff Bezos, net worth: 200B. Elon Musk, net worth: 800B.
  7. Both are actively running companies. That requires power. But the power comes from voting rights. So you split the shares. Jeff keeps the power, because he has a company to run. Elon runs several.
  8. But the money goes to end poverty. Now. Povety is a lack of cash. So you engineer direct cash transfers and end poverty. Zero leakage. India already has Aadhar and UPI. We build Aadhar and UPI everywhere else. Poverty has already become unnecessary. Make it happen. Consume all you will, the rest give away.
BHB (Black Hole Billionaire) Vs. RB (Radiant Billionaire)


The Flaw In Jeff’s And Elon’s Logic

Two Billionaires Escape Earth Because Earth Has Meetings

For years, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk have been warning humanity that Earth is fragile.

Climate change.

Asteroids.

Resource depletion.

Civilizational risk.

Humanity, they insist, must become multi-planetary.

This sounds noble until you realize the proposed solution is essentially:

“Things are getting messy here. Let’s move.”

It is the most expensive midlife crisis in human history.

Normal billionaires buy yachts.

Tech billionaires buy rockets because Earth has traffic.

The logic goes something like this:

Earth may someday become uninhabitable.

Therefore, humanity should colonize Mars.

This is like your kitchen sink leaking and responding by launching a submarine program.

Mars, notably, is not currently famous for being hospitable.

Earth has oxygen, oceans, forests, and coffee shops.

Mars has:
rocks.

That’s the brochure.

And yet Silicon Valley speaks about Mars with the enthusiasm of real estate agents selling luxury condos.

“Sure, temperatures can instantly kill you, but think of the upside.”

“Elon envisions vibrant communities.”

Sir, the planet doesn’t even have breathable air.

The greatest marketing achievement of the 21st century may be convincing intelligent people that Earth is the backup plan.

Meanwhile, Blue Origin and SpaceX are spending unimaginable sums of money firing rich people briefly into the upper atmosphere so they can return to Earth and say things like:

“Wow. Looking at Earth from space really made me appreciate Earth.”

This insight cost approximately $28 million.

Astronauts spent decades risking their lives for science.

Now billionaires go to space the way hedge fund managers go skiing in Aspen.

The marketing videos are always magnificent.

Slow-motion rocket launches.

Epic orchestral music.

Founders gazing heroically into the distance like Roman emperors who recently discovered machine learning.

And then a narrator whispers:
“Humanity must survive.”

Meanwhile, actual humans are stuck on hold with health insurance providers.

The flaw in Jeff’s and Elon’s logic is surprisingly simple:

If you possess the engineering talent, capital, and organizational power required to colonize another planet…

…you probably also possess the ability to fix many problems on this one.

This is what makes the whole thing unintentionally hilarious.

Imagine firefighters arriving at a burning house and announcing:

“We’ve decided to build a second house on the moon.”

Or imagine doctors saying:

“Curing disease is difficult. Have patients considered relocating to Neptune?”

Mars colonization discourse always skips over tiny details like:

  • Radiation that cooks human tissue.

  • Dust storms capable of destroying infrastructure.

  • Temperatures cold enough to insult Antarctica.

  • The minor inconvenience of needing a space suit to go outside.

Earth, by contrast, offers several premium features at no extra charge:

  • atmosphere

  • gravity

  • food

  • birds

  • breathable oxygen

  • tacos

Scientists spent billions searching the cosmos for a planet exactly like Earth.

Then billionaires looked at Earth and said:
“Eh. Needs more domes.”

The funniest part is the timeline optimism.

Every few years, someone announces:

“Humans on Mars within a decade.”

Mars has now become the tech equivalent of self-driving cars:
always five years away and demonstrated beautifully in promotional videos.

Meanwhile, the actual innovation happening on Earth is far less cinematic.

A biotech founder quietly mapping disease pathways does not produce dramatic rocket footage.

A scientist curing cancer lacks the visual excitement of flames shooting from a stainless-steel cylinder.

Nobody makes movie trailers for incremental improvements in public health infrastructure.

You cannot end a TED Talk with:
“And then we optimized hospital procurement systems.”

But that work matters enormously.

Civilization advances not merely through spectacle, but through boring competence.

Vaccines are boring.

Water systems are boring.

Power grids are boring.

Agricultural efficiency is boring.

Until they stop working.

Then suddenly everyone misses boring things very much.

Silicon Valley increasingly behaves like a civilization addicted to cinematic technology.

If it cannot become a Netflix documentary narrated by a British actor, investors lose interest.

Rocket launch?
Funding secured.

AI-generated video platform?
Series B.

An app that lets dogs create NFTs?
Unicorn valuation.

A company trying to reduce cancer mortality?
“Interesting. But where’s the viral growth loop?”

And yet history stubbornly suggests that societies survive because of medicine, infrastructure, governance, and science — not because wealthy men dramatically announce escape plans.

Even the phrase “multi-planetary species” sounds suspiciously like a startup pitch deck.

Slide 1:
Humanity is broken.

Slide 2:
Mars TAM is enormous.

Slide 3:
Interplanetary subscription revenue.

Slide 4:
Synergies.

There is also something emotionally revealing about all this.

Old industrialists built libraries.

Tech billionaires build apocalypse contingency plans.

Andrew Carnegie looked at wealth and thought:
“Public education.”

Modern billionaires look at wealth and think:
“Backup civilization.”

Perhaps this is simply the natural evolution of capitalism.

Stage 1:
Build railroads.

Stage 2:
Build software.

Stage 3:
Leave Earth entirely.

And yet Earth remains astonishingly beautiful despite its problems.

It contains music, oceans, friendships, forests, comedy, history, art, and the rare miracle of pizza arriving in under 30 minutes.

Mars currently contains none of these things.

Not even Wi-Fi.

But the deeper comedy is this:

The same people telling humanity that Earth is doomed are often the same people building companies that consume historic amounts of energy and compute. (Tom's Hardware)

Entire mountains of GPUs now hum endlessly so AI systems can generate fake videos, optimize ad targeting, and argue with strangers online.

Humanity finally achieved godlike computational power and immediately used it to create synthetic podcast clips.

Meanwhile, actual scientists quietly work on biology, disease, and energy systems with a fraction of the attention.

The future may ultimately belong less to the rocket billionaire and more to the person solving fundamental human problems.

The person curing disease.

The person improving food systems.

The person reducing suffering instead of merely relocating it to another planet.

Because if humanity cannot successfully manage Earth — a planet with oceans and oxygen — confidence about managing Mars may be slightly premature.

Mars is not easier Earth.

Mars is expert mode.



at
Labels: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)