Showing posts with label Adam Shuaib. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam Shuaib. Show all posts

Thursday, May 28, 2026

The Founder: Profile By Adam Shuaib

Six Weeks From Zero
The Founder And The Fisherman

Himalayan Compute: 10 Years To A Trillion: Detailed Roadmap
Nepal's Trillion Dollar Himalayan Compute Plan ๐Ÿ”️Himalayan Compute: Nepal’s Blueprint for Triple-Digit Economic Growth
Sameer Maskey: Why Nepal must build a sovereign ‘AI Factory’
เคฌुเคขाเคจीเคฒเค•ंเค  เคธ्เค•ुเคฒ: เคธ्เคฏाเค‰ เคฐुเค– เคฌाเคŸ เคเคฐ्เคฏो, เค…ंเคคเคฐिเค•्เคท เคคเคฐ्เคซ เคนाเคจเคจिเคฏो
Himalayan Compute: The Vehicle For Nepal's Economic Revolution
เค…เคฎेเคฐिเค•ाเคฎा เคฐเคนेเค•ो เคช्เคฐเคค्เคฏेเค• เคจेเคชाเคฒीเค•ो เค†เคฐ्เคฅिเค• เค•्เคฐांเคคि เค—เคฐ्เคจे เคช्เคฐเคฅเคฎ เคฐ เค…ंเคคिเคฎเคฎौเค•ा
Nepal's Trillion Dollar Himalayan AI Moonshot
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต The Super App That Will Transform Nepal

The Outlier Quotient: How we spot generational talent

After 15 years of seed investing, we realised that truly exceptional founders have something impossible to fake: deeply unconventional lives.

................. Firstly, genuine outliers make you uncomfortable in the first few minutes of meeting them. They are not rude, but there is an intensity to how they think and talk that sits outside the range of a normal professional conversation, and part of you registers it as mild fear. You get the sense that this person is wired tighter than most, almost to the point of seeming unhinged, but not so far that they stop listening or taking feedback. They are maniacal, but they are still in control; that combination is critical. .................. The second is obsession of a kind you do not see in any normal person. This is someone who, after a ten-hour day, opens their laptop at 10pm and reads EU payment regulations until 3am, and does this for years. The work is not something they do; it is the thing they cannot stop doing. Ask them what they would build if this idea fails and you get a blank stare. The company and the person are the same thing. There is no plan-B. ................ The third: they have something massive to prove and someone specific to prove it to. A teacher who told them they would not amount to much. A classmate, a coach, a boss, a rejection letter, a moment in a room where someone made it clear they did not belong. One founder we met keeps a framed letter from their sixth-grade teacher on the office wall, explaining why they would never amount to anything as an adult. ..................... The fourth is a history of hardship. Immigrant households, children raised by single parents, founders who grew up watching a sibling or a parent fall seriously ill. The hardship itself does not cause the success; it gives the founder a relationship with risk and discomfort that 99% of people cannot handle.

By 30, if you've spent your whole life inside a safety net, you can describe the idea of betting the house in fluent sentences but your body will not let you do it.

Something in you will pull your hand back at the last moment. ................... The fifth is that they have, by most ordinary measures, incredibly quirky/unusual personalities. They hold eye contact for slightly too long or not at all. They use words no one else uses. They have hobbies you've never heard of. One founder we met refused to take live pitch meetings and instead sent a fifteen-minute video he recorded alone in his kitchen. Neurodivergence in some form shows up far more often in our winners than in the broader population. These founders can be difficult at times. They are not always people you would be best friends with. ........................

seven binary signals: odd hobbies, early signs of exceptionalism, extreme life choices, unusual geographies, non-linear careers. Whether someone started coding at 10, speaks five languages, climbed Everest or quit a safe job to live in Chile, the signal was deviation from the mean.

..................... Rather than focusing on IQ or EQ, we call this metric the Outlier Quotient, or “OQ”. When forecasting founder success, it turns out that OQ was the single most predictive variable in our entire classification model, trained on ~70 different factors. ................ Our OQ score had zero correlation with having worked at a top-tier company or attending an elite university. It took us years to accept this, because the conventional signals feel like they should work. A Harvard PhD, four years at Meta, a stint at a hot Series-B; these are facts you can put in an IC memo. The trouble is they describe a population of people who are good at navigating institutions, and being good at navigating institutions is often orthogonal to being able to build one. .................. The best founders are not institutional optimisers. Most of them spent their lives being inordinately incompatible with whichever institution they were stuck in. .............. The hard part isn't believing the data, it's acting on it. Every incentive in the venture industry pulls toward the legible founder. The legible founder is easier to underwrite, easier to defend in a partner meeting, easier to explain to LPs and easier to introduce to other portfolio companies. The illegible founder is more work in every direction. You have to spend longer with them to see what's there. You have to tolerate meetings that feel weird. You have to defend internally a person who doesn't look the way founders are supposed to look. ......... If you want to spot breakout talent before the rest of the market, stop screening for conformity. Start screening for the life that didn't fit. Back the founders the system was built to filter out.

at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)